Is The Woman in the House Across the Street a Comedy or a Thriller? Spoiler: It’s Neither

Netflix’s The Woman in the House Across the Street From the Girl in the Window arrived with a title that’s longer than some movie plots, immediately signaling a dive into parody territory. Positioned as a comedic take on the popular psychological thriller genre, epitomized by The Woman in the Window and The Girl on the Train, the series stars Kristen Bell and promises a blend of suspense and laughs. However, the crucial question remains: does The Woman in the House Across the Street actually deliver on either front?

From the outset, the series leans heavily into thriller clichés. We are introduced to Anna (Bell), our protagonist, in classic unreliable narrator mode. She’s a woman seemingly on the brink, spending her days in a dressing gown, battling a wine addiction, and haunted by personal tragedy. The initial scenes attempt satire – Anna dramatically tenderizing chicken while somberly contemplating cream of mushroom soup sets a deliberately absurd tone. These opening moments suggest a self-aware spoof, promising to poke fun at the genre’s well-worn tropes. Her declaration about an “overactive imagination,” delivered with a theatrical English accent that quickly vanishes, feels like a wink at the audience, acknowledging the familiar narrative devices to come.

But this initial spark of comedic promise quickly fades. The Woman in the House Across the Street struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It meanders between attempting genuine suspense and awkward humor, ultimately failing to land convincingly in either genre. Anna’s constant wine consumption, meant to highlight the trope of the troubled protagonist, becomes repetitive rather than funny. Her obsession with the handsome new neighbor across the street and his young daughter feels more like a paint-by-numbers thriller plot than a clever deconstruction. Lines that are clearly intended to be satirical, such as the casserole metaphor for human complexity, fall flat, sounding simply…bad.

The series’ central problem lies in its inability to decide what it wants to be. Is The Woman in the House Across the Street genuinely attempting to be a dark comedy? Or is it simply a poorly executed thriller that mistakenly believes it’s funny? The introduction of heavy themes, like the horrific death of Anna’s daughter and the neighbor’s own grief over his deceased wife, further muddies the waters. Grief and trauma are complex subjects, and attempting to mine them for comedic fodder in a spoof requires an extremely delicate touch and a clear comedic vision. This series seems to lack both.

Even the question of Anna’s artistic talent, or lack thereof, adds to the confusion. Her artwork, prominently displayed in her turquoise-dominated house, appears to be intentionally awful. Is this part of the satire, mocking the cliché of the “tortured artist”? Or is it unintentionally bad, another symptom of the series’ overall tonal incoherence? It’s difficult to discern, and this ambiguity contributes to the sense that The Woman in the House Across the Street doesn’t fully understand its own intentions.

The series flirts with genuinely disturbing elements, but not in a way that feels purposeful or effectively satirical. Anna’s visions of her dead daughter, while intended to be darkly comedic, touch upon the genuine pain of grief. The moment where Anna’s daughter refuses a kiss “because I’m dead” and Anna’s subsequent sigh, “How do I keep forgetting that?”, ventures into territory that is more unsettling than humorous. Grief is indeed a landscape where the lines between reality and memory blur, but the series fails to navigate this with the necessary sensitivity or comedic precision.

Ultimately, The Woman in the House Across the Street From the Girl in the Window is a confusing viewing experience. It sets out to parody psychological thrillers but gets lost in its own tonal uncertainty. While the premise held comedic potential, the execution falls short, leaving viewers wondering whether they were supposed to laugh, be thrilled, or simply be bewildered. Instead of a sharp satire, we are left with a series that is neither genuinely funny nor suspenseful, proving that some genres are perhaps best left un-parodied, or at least, require a much more deft hand than displayed here.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *