Four years ago, Sesame Street made a landmark introduction that resonated deeply within the autism community and beyond. Julia, a sunshine-yellow Muppet with a gentle demeanor and a fondness for her toy rabbit Fluffster, became the show’s first autistic character in over a decade. Initially presented in an online picture book and later integrated into the beloved TV program, Julia’s creation was a collaborative effort, shaped by autism advocates and researchers. Her presence alongside iconic characters like Elmo and Abby Cadabby brought a new dimension of representation to Sesame Street, even leading to a heartwarming appearance in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. For many, including autistic individuals, Julia was a symbol of progress and understanding.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/16757315/julia_sesame_street_autism_620.0.0.jpg)
However, this celebrated character has recently become entangled in controversy due to Sesame Street‘s association with Autism Speaks, specifically regarding the promotion of the “100 Day Kit” resource. This kit has drawn criticism for perpetuating outdated and harmful narratives about autism, casting a shadow over Julia’s otherwise positive representation.
The Groundbreaking Introduction of Julia on Sesame Street
Julia’s arrival on Sesame Street was a significant moment for autistic representation in media. For years, portrayals of autism in popular culture were often limited and stereotypical, frequently focusing on savant abilities or portraying autistic individuals as detached and unemotional. Julia broke these molds. She was presented as a child with her own unique way of experiencing the world, highlighting both her strengths and the challenges she might face.
Her interactions with Elmo and Abby Cadabby showcased the simple yet profound concept of acceptance and understanding. In “The Amazing Song,” Sesame Street beautifully articulated this message, emphasizing that while individuals may have different feelings and ways of expressing themselves, everyone deserves to be included and valued. For many autistic viewers and their families, this message was incredibly moving. As the original article’s author poignantly noted, hearing “We all can feel happy, we all can feel mad” was a deeply emotional experience, countering the harmful misconception that autistic people lack emotions.
Julia’s character was developed with the active involvement of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN), a leading organization run by and for autistic people. This collaboration was groundbreaking, ensuring that Julia’s portrayal was authentic and respectful, reflecting the lived experiences of autistic individuals. It stood in stark contrast to many previous representations of autism, which often lacked input from the autistic community itself. Julia quickly became a symbol of positive change, demonstrating that media could portray autism in a nuanced and empowering way.
The Controversy: Sesame Street and Autism Speaks’ Partnership
The positive image of Julia, however, has been complicated by Sesame Street‘s decision to partner with Autism Speaks to promote the organization’s “100 Day Kit for Young Children.” This resource, intended for families newly navigating an autism diagnosis, has become a point of contention due to its problematic content.
While the public service announcements featuring Julia promoting the kit initially appear to focus on acceptance and early screening, a closer examination of the 100 Day Kit reveals a more concerning narrative. The kit has been criticized for employing language that equates having an autistic child with experiencing grief, even suggesting that parents may go through the Kübler-Ross stages of grief – denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance – as if their child has passed away. This framing is deeply upsetting to many in the autism community, as it pathologizes autism and implies that autistic children are a source of sorrow rather than joy.
This partnership led to ASAN severing ties with Sesame Street. Despite ASAN’s objections and concerns about the harmful messages contained within the 100 Day Kit, Sesame Street proceeded with the partnership, leading to ASAN’s difficult but principled decision.
Understanding Autism Speaks and the 100 Day Kit
Autism Speaks, while one of the most visible autism charities, has a long history of controversy within the autism community. Historically, the organization has focused heavily on searching for a “cure” for autism and has been criticized for portraying autism as a tragedy that devastates families. While Autism Speaks has publicly stated that it is no longer actively seeking a cure, the 100 Day Kit contradicts this claim, repeatedly referencing the pursuit of a “cure” and suggesting that early intervention can offer “hope” to parents.
Furthermore, the 100 Day Kit includes recommendations that lack scientific backing, such as suggesting restrictive gluten-free, dairy-free diets for autistic children. This type of advice, presented alongside evidence-based interventions like occupational therapy, blurs the lines between validated treatments and unsubstantiated claims, potentially misleading parents.
The most damaging aspect of the 100 Day Kit, however, remains its underlying narrative of grief and loss. By framing autism as a condition akin to death or a terminal illness, the kit perpetuates negative stereotypes and undermines the self-advocacy movement within the autism community, which emphasizes acceptance, inclusion, and neurodiversity.
Why ASAN’s Stance Matters
ASAN’s decision to end its partnership with Sesame Street underscores the importance of autistic voices in shaping the narrative around autism. As an organization led by autistic individuals, ASAN brings a crucial perspective to the conversation, advocating for acceptance and understanding from the viewpoint of lived experience.
The organization’s stance highlights the fundamental difference in approach between groups like ASAN and Autism Speaks. While ASAN champions neurodiversity and seeks to empower autistic individuals, Autism Speaks has historically focused on pathologizing autism and seeking to eradicate it. The 100 Day Kit, with its grief-based narrative and emphasis on cure research, exemplifies this contrasting viewpoint.
By prioritizing the promotion of the 100 Day Kit over the concerns of autistic self-advocates, Sesame Street inadvertently lent its platform to a message that is fundamentally at odds with the spirit of inclusion and acceptance embodied by Julia.
The Importance of Positive Representation: Julia’s Legacy
Despite the controversy surrounding the Autism Speaks partnership, Julia’s impact as a character remains significant. She has provided a much-needed positive representation of autism in mainstream media, demonstrating to children and adults alike that autistic individuals are valued members of society with their own unique strengths and perspectives.
Julia’s portrayal on Sesame Street has offered a vision of a world where autistic children are embraced by their peers, where differences are celebrated, and where understanding and support are readily available. This positive image is crucial in counteracting the often negative and fear-based narratives that have historically dominated the conversation around autism.
Moving forward, it is vital that Sesame Street reconsiders its association with organizations that promote harmful and outdated views of autism. The show has a powerful platform to shape public perception, and it is essential that this platform is used to amplify messages of acceptance, inclusion, and respect for neurodiversity, aligning with the positive legacy of Julia and the values she represents. Autistic individuals and their families deserve to embrace Julia without reservation, knowing that her presence on Sesame Street truly reflects a commitment to understanding and celebrating the diversity of the human experience.
